The Simpsons Movie makes certain assumptions, chief amongst which is a belief that its audience is already in love with its characters. The result is a film unburdened by exposition. There’s no attempt to snappily re-introduce the Simpson family, nor an effort to remind the viewer what made their world great when the show started in 1989. Instead, the film opens with a scene from the Itchy and Scratchy Movie, though it’s never labelled as such. It’s a reference you’re only going to get if you’re familiar with the television series.
This is unfortunate. I am deeply familiar with The Simpsons (the first ten seasons, at least), but the show hasn’t been funny in a long time. I was hoping that the movie would be re-invigorating, or at least that it would have some energy. Instead I got entirely what I expected: a gentle comedy that rests upon the laurels of the TV show circa 1995.
Why does the movie exist? The easy answer would be to say, “Cash-in.” But they’ve resisted doing a film for eighteen years. It’s not like they tried to capitalise on momentary hype and rushed this thing out the door.
Normally, to justify a movie adaptation of a present-day TV show, you raise the stakes and make use of a larger budget. Everything is bigger and more dramatic. Now the whole city is in danger! The whole planet! Lives are torn asunder!
But The Simpsons is an animated show, free from the constraints of a regular live-action budget. The town has been on the verge of destruction fifty times before.
The film isn’t even terrible, just ten years too late. There is nothing more that can be said with these characters. There is nothing more we can learn about them that we don’t already know, and no personal drama they can experience that we haven’t already seen. Marge leaves Homer four times a season. It doesn’t raise the tension to have it happen again, especially when it’s such a hopeless piece of schmuck-bait to begin with. Everything in the film has been done, in some form, in the television series.
Attempts at social satire fall equally flat. Having Arnold Schwarzenegger be the US President is hardly a witty or original comment. But Schwarzenegger as portrayed in the movie looks and sounds exactly like Rainier Wolfcastle/McBain, The Simpsons’ frequently used lampoon of Schwarzenegger-style action stars. So why not just have Wolfcastle be President? The joke would be the same and it would it actually make sense.
This is all too unsurprising to be a disappointment.
There remain plenty of amusing gags. Nothing laugh-out-loud funny, no moments you’re lilkely to be quoting to your friends. But it might make you smile, and it might make you chuckle. Unfortunately, this will happen a lot less if you happen to have a good memory for inane details. You’ll be too busy noticing all the similarities to the show.
I’ve listed some of those similarities below, with appropriate screengrabs from series and film. Naturally, this means there are massive spoilers.
This was all done from memory. Pity me.
Read the rest of this entry »